Key Rating Drivers & Detailed Description
Strengths:
Suryoday’s capital position remained strong reflected with Tier I and Total CAR of 33.1% and 35.9%, respectively as of Sep 2022 (34.4% and 37.9%, respectively, on March 31, 2022). Networth as on Sep 2022 was reported at Rs 1,527 crore. The bank raised fresh equity of Rs 248 crore through its IPO in March 2021 which strengthened its capitalization. Additionally, the bank has had adequate flexibility to raise capital in the past: it raised Rs 288 crore in fiscal 2017, Rs 25.6 crore in 2018, around Rs 248 crore of equity in 2019 and Rs 63 crore of equity in 2020. The CAR is likely to be healthy at above 25% while gearing should remain below 4 times, over the medium term.
- Displayed ability to ramp-up retail term deposit franchise
The deposit base has registered steady growth since inception with an increasing share of retail deposits as a proportion of total deposits.. Deposits grew 18% in fiscal 2022 to Rs 3,850 crore (60% of total external liabilities). The share of retail deposits increased to 78% as of March 2022 from 50.3% in March 2020. In the first-half of fiscal 2023, the Bank had a deposit base of Rs 4,207 crore, of which 72% were retail deposits. Moreover, over 100% of the bank’s bulk deposit is non-callable in nature.
Granularity of deposits has also improved as the share of term deposit in the less than Rs 15 lakh ticket size increased to 52% in March 2022 from 40% in March 2021. Of the total term deposits, as on March 31, 2022, 53% were for a period exceeding a year. This helps contain the risk of unexpected reduction in deposit base. Meanwhile, traction in CASA has remained low and stood at 17.3% of total deposit base and 11.1% of the total external liabilities as of September 30, 2022, as compared to 18.8% of total deposit base and 11.3% of the total external liabilities as of March 2022.
- Extensive experience of the board and senior management
The senior management has longstanding experience in the financial services sector. Mr Baskar Babu, the managing director and Chief Executive Officer, is one of the promoters who has held senior positions in several institutions. Board of directors and senior management comprise experienced and renowned professionals from the financial services sector, strongly oriented towards establishing high-quality and scalable systems and processes.
Weakness:
- Moderate earning profile owing to higher credit cost
After profitability deteriorated in fiscal 2018, it improved in 2019 and again in 2020. In absolute terms, pre-provisioning profit was Rs 306 crore in fiscal 2020 against Rs 212 crore in 2019. Operating expense ratio has also remained under control despite transition to from an MFI to a bank.
However, earnings were affected in fiscal 2021 due to interest reversal on account of higher NPAs, leading to decline in net interest income. Furthermore, because of pandemic-related stress, the bank reported higher provisioning that led to profit after tax of Rs 12 crore in fiscal 2021 with return on assets of 0.2%; against PAT of Rs 111 crore and return on assets of 2.5% in fiscal 2020.
Profitability was further affected in fiscal 2022 due to higher credit costs (5.36% in FY22 versus 2.8% in FY21) resulting in a loss of Rs 93 for FY22 crore. On the other hand, pre-provisioning profit improved to Rs 265 crore in fiscal 2022 as compared to Rs 181 crore in fiscal 2021. . In H1 2023, the bank reported PAT of Rs 21 crore with credit cost of 3.5%(annualised) as compared to loss of Rs 50 crore and credit cost of 6.2% (annualised) in H1 2022. Going forward, operating and overall profitability is expected to restore gradually in the normal course of business over the medium term.
Over the last two years, asset quality of the bank has been impacted owing to the pandemic disrupting the cash flows and repayment capabilities of several borrowers. Asset quality remained weak with GNPA and NNPA at 11.8% and 6.0%, respectively; against 9.4% and 4.7%, respectively, in March 2021. As of September 2022, GNPA and NNPA improved to 9.9% and 4.8%, respectively with provisioning coverage ratio of 54.5%. Moreover, around 26% of the GNPA accounts are paying customers as of September 2022. Additionally, the bank has outstanding standard restructured portfolio of Rs 185 crore as of H1 2023, billing for which has already started from July 2022 onwards.
While strong capitalisation provides a buffer against asset quality deterioration, revival to pre-pandemic metrics will take time, and the ability of the bank to reinstate repayment discipline among customers will be a monitorable.
- Modest credit risk profile of the borrowers and low seasoning in the non-microfinance portfolio
A significant portion of the portfolio (64% in 1H2023) comprises microfinance loans to clients with below-average credit risk profiles and lack of access to formal credit. These customers belong to the semi-skilled self-employed category with volatile incomes that depend on the local economy. Slowdown in economic activity has put pressure on such borrowers' cash flows, thereby restricting their repayment capability. This segment of borrowers continues to be subjected to idiosyncratic risks on account of socio-political factors.
As far as the non-microfinance segment is concerned (accounts for 36% of the AUM), the bank’s track record is limited, with low vintage in divisions such as commercial vehicle loans, home loans, and loan against property. Despite gradual expansion into non-microfinance products in recent years, their share in the total AUM remains low. The overall portfolio is distributed across Maharashtra (32%), Tamil Nadu (25%), Odisha (14%), Gujarat (11%), Karnataka (6%) and Madhya Pradesh (7%) as of Sep 2022. The Bank also has limited presence in Chhattisgarh, Puducherry, Telangana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Chandigarh and Delhi.
As the bank intends to increase share of the non-microfinance segments, ability to maintain sound asset quality while managing growth and profitability across economic cycles would be a key monitorable.